Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (212.82 USD vs 725.05 USD)
Better camera (962 points vs 887 points)
Better battery (517 points vs 504 points)
Against:
Worse performance (476 points vs 954 points)
Worse connectivity (369 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (685 points vs 987 points)
Worse design (631 points vs 848 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.14 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4085mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (85.19 percents vs 88.78 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (954 points vs 476 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 369 points)
Better display (987 points vs 685 points)
Better design (848 points vs 631 points)
Against:
Higher price (725.05 USD vs 212.82 USD)
Worse camera (887 points vs 962 points)
Worse battery (504 points vs 517 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.14 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4085mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.78 percents vs 85.19 percents)