Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Elephone E10 Pro
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Elephone E10 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (962 points vs 740 points)
Better battery (517 points vs 305 points)
Better performance (476 points vs 381 points)
Better display (685 points vs 234 points)
Better design (631 points vs 302 points)
Against:
Higher price (212.82 USD vs 130 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.14 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Against:
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.19 percents vs 62.43 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (130 USD vs 212.82 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (740 points vs 962 points)
Worse battery (305 points vs 517 points)
Worse performance (381 points vs 476 points)
Worse display (234 points vs 685 points)
Worse design (302 points vs 631 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.14 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (62.43 percents vs 85.19 percents)