Huawei Honor Play 3 vs Ulefone Armor X6
Compare Phones: Huawei Honor Play 3 vs Ulefone Armor X6
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (603 points vs 43 points)
Better performance (482 points vs 52 points)
Better connectivity (172 points vs 41 points)
Better display (220 points vs 46 points)
Better design (671 points vs 65 points)
Against:
Higher price (235.53 USD vs 175.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 1300 megahertz)
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
More gpu cores (4 cores vs 2 cores)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 2048 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.39 inch vs 5 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.65 percents vs 58.42 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (175.99 USD vs 235.53 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (43 points vs 603 points)
Worse performance (52 points vs 482 points)
Worse connectivity (41 points vs 172 points)
Worse display (46 points vs 220 points)
Worse design (65 points vs 671 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1300 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Less gpu cores (2 cores vs 4 cores)
Less ram (2048 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 6.39 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (58.42 percents vs 82.65 percents)