OnePlus 7T Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro

For:

      Lower price (725.05 USD vs 787.69 USD)

      Better performance (954 points vs 928 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 638 points)

      Better display (987 points vs 901 points)

      Better design (849 points vs 832 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (888 points vs 996 points)

      Worse battery (506 points vs 644 points)

For:

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4085mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

      More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 386 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (88.78 percents vs 90.08 percents)

For:

      Better camera (996 points vs 888 points)

      Better battery (644 points vs 506 points)

Against:

      Higher price (787.69 USD vs 725.05 USD)

      Worse performance (928 points vs 954 points)

      Worse connectivity (638 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (901 points vs 987 points)

      Worse design (832 points vs 849 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4085mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)

      Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (386 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (90.08 percents vs 88.78 percents)