OnePlus 7T Pro vs nubia Red Magic 5G
Compare Phones: OnePlus 7T Pro vs nubia Red Magic 5G
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (954 points vs 928 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 788 points)
Better display (987 points vs 815 points)
Better design (849 points vs 473 points)
Against:
Higher price (725.05 USD vs 589.59 USD)
Worse camera (888 points vs 954 points)
Worse battery (506 points vs 644 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 12.58 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4085mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.65 inch)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 388 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.78 percents vs 82.83 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (589.59 USD vs 725.05 USD)
Better camera (954 points vs 888 points)
Better battery (644 points vs 506 points)
Against:
Worse performance (928 points vs 954 points)
Worse connectivity (788 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (815 points vs 987 points)
Worse design (473 points vs 849 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (12.58 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4085mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.65 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (388 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.83 percents vs 88.78 percents)