Xiaomi Mi MIX Alpha vs Asus ROG Phone 5
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi MIX Alpha vs Asus ROG Phone 5
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (993 points vs 928 points)
Better performance (993 points vs 756 points)
Better display (964 points vs 928 points)
Better design (999 points vs 488 points)
Against:
Higher price (905.99 USD vs 627.71 USD)
Worse battery (331 points vs 927 points)
Worse connectivity (626 points vs 971 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4050mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2960 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (675 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (7.92 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Higher pixel density (388 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (181.36 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (627.71 USD vs 905.99 USD)
Better battery (927 points vs 331 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 626 points)
Against:
Worse camera (928 points vs 993 points)
Worse performance (756 points vs 993 points)
Worse display (928 points vs 964 points)
Worse design (488 points vs 999 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4050mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 675 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2960 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.78 inch vs 7.92 inch)
Lower pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 388 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.98 percents vs 181.36 percents)