Samsung Galaxy Note5 vs UMiDIGI Power 3

For:

      Lower price (155.99 USD vs 199.99 USD)

      Better display (881 points vs 521 points)

      Better design (514 points vs 395 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (425 points vs 831 points)

      Worse battery (82 points vs 947 points)

      Worse performance (462 points vs 505 points)

      Worse connectivity (581 points vs 884 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (15.87 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 6150mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2100 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (8 cores vs 3 cores)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (772 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)

      Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.7 inch vs 6.53 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (77.06 percents vs 83.91 percents)

For:

      Better camera (831 points vs 425 points)

      Better battery (947 points vs 82 points)

      Better performance (505 points vs 462 points)

      Better connectivity (884 points vs 581 points)

Against:

      Higher price (199.99 USD vs 155.99 USD)

      Worse display (521 points vs 881 points)

      Worse design (395 points vs 514 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 15.87 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6150mAh vs 3000mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 772 megahertz)

      More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2100 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 8 cores)

For:

      Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 5.7 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.91 percents vs 77.06 percents)