HiSense A5 vs LG Velvet
Compare Phones: HiSense A5 vs LG Velvet
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (252.88 USD vs 758.43 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (141 points vs 813 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 585 points)
Worse performance (382 points vs 895 points)
Worse connectivity (435 points vs 702 points)
Worse display (126 points vs 746 points)
Worse design (448 points vs 990 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1950 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.84 inch vs 6.8 inch)
Lower pixel density (276 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.81 percents vs 88.97 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (813 points vs 141 points)
Better battery (585 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (895 points vs 382 points)
Better connectivity (702 points vs 435 points)
Better display (746 points vs 126 points)
Better design (990 points vs 448 points)
Against:
Higher price (758.43 USD vs 252.88 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4300mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 1950 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.8 inch vs 5.84 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 276 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.97 percents vs 76.81 percents)