Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Huawei Honor 30S

For:

      Lower price (403 USD vs 524.21 USD)

      Better camera (997 points vs 762 points)

      Better battery (890 points vs 377 points)

      Better display (877 points vs 713 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (700 points vs 918 points)

      Worse connectivity (476 points vs 661 points)

      Worse design (562 points vs 722 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 63.7 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.5 inch)

      Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 84.07 percents)

For:

      Better performance (918 points vs 700 points)

      Better connectivity (661 points vs 476 points)

      Better design (722 points vs 562 points)

Against:

      Higher price (524.21 USD vs 403 USD)

      Worse camera (762 points vs 997 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 890 points)

      Worse display (713 points vs 877 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (63.7 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5260mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.47 inches)

      Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.07 percents vs 88.05 percents)