Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs POCO F2 Pro

For:

      Lower price (403 USD vs 550 USD)

      Better camera (997 points vs 971 points)

      Better battery (890 points vs 758 points)

      Better connectivity (476 points vs 204 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (700 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (877 points vs 937 points)

      Worse design (562 points vs 788 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4700mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.67 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 87.52 percents)

For:

      Better performance (832 points vs 700 points)

      Better display (937 points vs 877 points)

      Better design (788 points vs 562 points)

Against:

      Higher price (550 USD vs 403 USD)

      Worse camera (971 points vs 997 points)

      Worse battery (758 points vs 890 points)

      Worse connectivity (204 points vs 476 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (20 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4700mAh vs 5260mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.47 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (87.52 percents vs 88.05 percents)