Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (403 USD vs 418.71 USD)
Better camera (997 points vs 980 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 643 points)
Better performance (698 points vs 567 points)
Better connectivity (473 points vs 391 points)
Against:
Worse display (876 points vs 936 points)
Worse design (559 points vs 661 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 19.7 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 87.52 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better display (936 points vs 876 points)
Better design (661 points vs 559 points)
Against:
Higher price (418.71 USD vs 403 USD)
Worse camera (980 points vs 997 points)
Worse battery (643 points vs 890 points)
Worse performance (567 points vs 698 points)
Worse connectivity (391 points vs 473 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (19.7 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (87.52 percents vs 88.05 percents)