Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Xiaomi Mi 11i
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Xiaomi Mi 11i
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (403 USD vs 598.12 USD)
Better camera (997 points vs 307 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 705 points)
Against:
Worse performance (698 points vs 754 points)
Worse connectivity (473 points vs 831 points)
Worse display (876 points vs 936 points)
Worse design (559 points vs 965 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 24 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 86.16 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (754 points vs 698 points)
Better connectivity (831 points vs 473 points)
Better display (936 points vs 876 points)
Better design (965 points vs 559 points)
Against:
Higher price (598.12 USD vs 403 USD)
Worse camera (307 points vs 997 points)
Worse battery (705 points vs 890 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4520mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.16 percents vs 88.05 percents)