Samsung Galaxy A51 vs Realme GT Neo Flash
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy A51 vs Realme GT Neo Flash
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (262.59 USD vs 448 USD)
Better display (795 points vs 749 points)
Better design (878 points vs 793 points)
Against:
Worse camera (923 points vs 937 points)
Worse battery (308 points vs 644 points)
Worse performance (502 points vs 803 points)
Worse connectivity (152 points vs 737 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 3000 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 9 cores)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (87.72 percents vs 86.2 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (937 points vs 923 points)
Better battery (644 points vs 308 points)
Better performance (803 points vs 502 points)
Better connectivity (737 points vs 152 points)
Against:
Higher price (448 USD vs 262.59 USD)
Worse display (749 points vs 795 points)
Worse design (793 points vs 878 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
More gpu cores (9 cores vs 3 cores)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.43 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (86.2 percents vs 87.72 percents)