Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite vs POCO F2 Pro

For:

      Lower price (529.64 USD vs 550 USD)

      Better connectivity (679 points vs 204 points)

      Better design (892 points vs 788 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (626 points vs 971 points)

      Worse battery (644 points vs 758 points)

      Worse performance (813 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (758 points vs 937 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)

      Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 20 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4700mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2700 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      Lower gpu frequency (572 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.7 inch vs 6.67 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (377 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (90.23 percents vs 87.52 percents)

For:

      Better camera (971 points vs 626 points)

      Better battery (758 points vs 644 points)

      Better performance (832 points vs 813 points)

      Better display (937 points vs 758 points)

Against:

      Higher price (550 USD vs 529.64 USD)

      Worse connectivity (204 points vs 679 points)

      Worse design (788 points vs 892 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)

      Worse front camera resolution (20 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4700mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2700 megahertz)

      Higher gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 572 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 377 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.67 inch vs 6.7 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (87.52 percents vs 90.23 percents)