Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite vs Vivo X50
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite vs Vivo X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (529.64 USD vs 998.39 USD)
Better battery (644 points vs 545 points)
Better connectivity (679 points vs 608 points)
Against:
Worse camera (626 points vs 874 points)
Worse performance (813 points vs 895 points)
Worse display (758 points vs 801 points)
Worse design (892 points vs 978 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2700 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.7 inch vs 6.56 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (377 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.23 percents vs 87.24 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (874 points vs 626 points)
Better performance (895 points vs 813 points)
Better display (801 points vs 758 points)
Better design (978 points vs 892 points)
Against:
Higher price (998.39 USD vs 529.64 USD)
Worse battery (545 points vs 644 points)
Worse connectivity (608 points vs 679 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2700 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 377 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.56 inch vs 6.7 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (87.24 percents vs 90.23 percents)