Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite vs Asus ROG Phone 5
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite vs Asus ROG Phone 5
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (529.64 USD vs 627.71 USD)
Better performance (813 points vs 756 points)
Better design (892 points vs 488 points)
Against:
Worse camera (626 points vs 928 points)
Worse battery (644 points vs 927 points)
Worse connectivity (679 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (758 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (32.33 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2700 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (572 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.7 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Lower pixel density (377 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.23 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (928 points vs 626 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 644 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 679 points)
Better display (928 points vs 758 points)
Against:
Higher price (627.71 USD vs 529.64 USD)
Worse performance (756 points vs 813 points)
Worse design (488 points vs 892 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 32.33 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2700 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 572 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.7 inches)
Higher pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 377 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.98 percents vs 90.23 percents)