Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Compare Phones: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (866.49 USD vs 1698.21 USD)
Better display (965 points vs 928 points)
Better design (988 points vs 483 points)
Against:
Worse camera (185 points vs 928 points)
Worse battery (219 points vs 928 points)
Worse performance (954 points vs 997 points)
Worse connectivity (946 points vs 971 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (3300mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2950 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (700 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Less rom (262144 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (425 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.7 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.78 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (928 points vs 185 points)
Better battery (928 points vs 219 points)
Better performance (997 points vs 954 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 946 points)
Against:
Higher price (1698.21 USD vs 866.49 USD)
Worse display (928 points vs 965 points)
Worse design (483 points vs 988 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 3300mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 700 megahertz)
More ram (16384 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.7 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 425 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.98 percents vs 82.78 percents)