Xiaomi Mi 10 vs UMiDIGI A9
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 10 vs UMiDIGI A9
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (974 points vs 175 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 161 points)
Better display (900 points vs 282 points)
Better design (831 points vs 407 points)
Against:
Higher price (500.25 USD vs 119.69 USD)
Worse battery (767 points vs 870 points)
Worse connectivity (637 points vs 848 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4780mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Higher pixel density (386 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (90.08 percents vs 81.64 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (119.69 USD vs 500.25 USD)
Better battery (870 points vs 767 points)
Better connectivity (848 points vs 637 points)
Against:
Worse camera (175 points vs 974 points)
Worse performance (161 points vs 928 points)
Worse display (282 points vs 900 points)
Worse design (407 points vs 831 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4780mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 386 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (81.64 percents vs 90.08 percents)