Xiaomi Mi 10 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro

For:

      Better camera (974 points vs 750 points)

      Better battery (767 points vs 705 points)

      Better performance (928 points vs 554 points)

Against:

      Higher price (500.25 USD vs 475.66 USD)

      Worse connectivity (637 points vs 725 points)

      Worse display (900 points vs 936 points)

      Worse design (831 points vs 935 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (108.58 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4780mAh vs 4520mAh)

For:

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (386 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (90.08 percents vs 86.16 percents)

For:

      Lower price (475.66 USD vs 500.25 USD)

      Better connectivity (725 points vs 637 points)

      Better display (936 points vs 900 points)

      Better design (935 points vs 831 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (750 points vs 974 points)

      Worse battery (705 points vs 767 points)

      Worse performance (554 points vs 928 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)

      Worse video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 108.58 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4780mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

Against:

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 386 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (86.16 percents vs 90.08 percents)