Sony Xperia 1 II vs OnePlus 9 Pro

For:

      Better performance (928 points vs 754 points)

      Better design (932 points vs 928 points)

Against:

      Higher price (1247.61 USD vs 189 USD)

      Worse camera (452 points vs 967 points)

      Worse battery (375 points vs 643 points)

      Worse connectivity (938 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (983 points vs 994 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.19 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 16.04 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (643 pixels per inch vs 520 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.5 inch vs 6.77 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.26 percents vs 92.12 percents)

For:

      Lower price (189 USD vs 1247.61 USD)

      Better camera (967 points vs 452 points)

      Better battery (643 points vs 375 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 938 points)

      Better display (994 points vs 983 points)

Against:

      Worse performance (754 points vs 928 points)

      Worse design (928 points vs 932 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.19 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (16.04 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

Against:

      Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.77 inch vs 6.5 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (520 pixels per inch vs 643 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (92.12 percents vs 84.26 percents)