LG V60 ThinQ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Compare Phones: LG V60 ThinQ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (773 points vs 577 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 722 points)
Against:
Higher price (1999.5 USD vs 358.24 USD)
Worse camera (731 points vs 777 points)
Worse connectivity (699 points vs 831 points)
Worse display (744 points vs 909 points)
Worse design (754 points vs 993 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4250mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.8 inch vs 6.55 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.85 percents vs 85.48 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (358.24 USD vs 1999.5 USD)
Better camera (777 points vs 731 points)
Better connectivity (831 points vs 699 points)
Better display (909 points vs 744 points)
Better design (993 points vs 754 points)
Against:
Worse battery (577 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (722 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4250mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.8 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (85.48 percents vs 83.85 percents)