nubia Red Magic 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Compare Phones: nubia Red Magic 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (954 points vs 798 points)
Better performance (928 points vs 168 points)
Better connectivity (788 points vs 263 points)
Better display (815 points vs 687 points)
Against:
Higher price (589.59 USD vs 182.99 USD)
Worse battery (644 points vs 743 points)
Worse design (473 points vs 578 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse front camera resolution (12.58 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 1000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.65 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (388 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.83 percents vs 83.81 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (182.99 USD vs 589.59 USD)
Better battery (743 points vs 644 points)
Better design (578 points vs 473 points)
Against:
Worse camera (798 points vs 954 points)
Worse performance (168 points vs 928 points)
Worse connectivity (263 points vs 788 points)
Worse display (687 points vs 815 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 12.58 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (1000 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 388 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.65 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.81 percents vs 82.83 percents)