Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Huawei P40 Pro+
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Huawei P40 Pro+
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (215 USD vs 1274.57 USD)
Better camera (681 points vs 595 points)
Better battery (857 points vs 545 points)
Against:
Worse performance (551 points vs 961 points)
Worse connectivity (263 points vs 805 points)
Worse display (775 points vs 842 points)
Worse design (667 points vs 815 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (750 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.58 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.78 percents vs 91.92 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (961 points vs 551 points)
Better connectivity (805 points vs 263 points)
Better display (842 points vs 775 points)
Better design (815 points vs 667 points)
Against:
Higher price (1274.57 USD vs 215 USD)
Worse camera (595 points vs 681 points)
Worse battery (545 points vs 857 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 750 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.58 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.92 percents vs 84.78 percents)