Xiaomi Redmi K30 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9

For:

      Lower price (443.6 USD vs 499.85 USD)

      Better camera (980 points vs 864 points)

      Better performance (832 points vs 650 points)

      Better display (937 points vs 630 points)

      Better design (729 points vs 132 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (758 points vs 961 points)

      Worse connectivity (395 points vs 927 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (19.7 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4700mAh vs 6600mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)

Against:

      Lower gpu frequency (587 megahertz vs 970 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.3 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (87.52 percents vs 70.87 percents)

For:

      Better battery (961 points vs 758 points)

      Better connectivity (927 points vs 395 points)

Against:

      Higher price (499.85 USD vs 443.6 USD)

      Worse camera (864 points vs 980 points)

      Worse performance (650 points vs 832 points)

      Worse display (630 points vs 937 points)

      Worse design (132 points vs 729 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 19.7 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6600mAh vs 4700mAh)

For:

      Higher gpu frequency (970 megahertz vs 587 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

For:

      Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.67 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (70.87 percents vs 87.52 percents)