Huawei P40 Pro+ vs Doogee X95 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei P40 Pro+ vs Doogee X95 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (595 points vs 245 points)
Better performance (961 points vs 283 points)
Better connectivity (805 points vs 152 points)
Better display (842 points vs 377 points)
Better design (815 points vs 650 points)
Against:
Higher price (1274.57 USD vs 123.29 USD)
Worse battery (545 points vs 613 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4200mAh vs 4350mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.58 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Higher pixel density (441 pixels per inch vs 264 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.92 percents vs 82.85 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (123.29 USD vs 1274.57 USD)
Better battery (613 points vs 545 points)
Against:
Worse camera (245 points vs 595 points)
Worse performance (283 points vs 961 points)
Worse connectivity (152 points vs 805 points)
Worse display (377 points vs 842 points)
Worse design (650 points vs 815 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4350mAh vs 4200mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.58 inch)
Lower pixel density (264 pixels per inch vs 441 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.85 percents vs 91.92 percents)