Oppo A72 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Compare Phones: Oppo A72 vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (290.41 USD vs 317 USD)
Better performance (865 points vs 698 points)
Better design (747 points vs 559 points)
Against:
Worse camera (669 points vs 978 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 890 points)
Worse connectivity (285 points vs 473 points)
Worse display (546 points vs 876 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.5 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Higher pixel density (405 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (82.75 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (978 points vs 669 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 773 points)
Better connectivity (473 points vs 285 points)
Better display (876 points vs 546 points)
Against:
Higher price (317 USD vs 290.41 USD)
Worse performance (698 points vs 865 points)
Worse design (559 points vs 747 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.5 inch)
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 405 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 82.75 percents)