LG Velvet vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Compare Phones: LG Velvet vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (895 points vs 700 points)
Better connectivity (702 points vs 476 points)
Better design (990 points vs 562 points)
Against:
Higher price (758.43 USD vs 317 USD)
Worse camera (813 points vs 978 points)
Worse battery (585 points vs 890 points)
Worse display (746 points vs 877 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4300mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.8 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.97 percents vs 88.05 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (317 USD vs 758.43 USD)
Better camera (978 points vs 813 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 585 points)
Better display (877 points vs 746 points)
Against:
Worse performance (700 points vs 895 points)
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 702 points)
Worse design (562 points vs 990 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4300mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.8 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (88.05 percents vs 88.97 percents)