Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Asus ROG Phone 3
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (317 USD vs 384.99 USD)
Better camera (978 points vs 964 points)
Better design (562 points vs 392 points)
Against:
Worse battery (890 points vs 927 points)
Worse performance (700 points vs 994 points)
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (877 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5260mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.47 inch vs 6.59 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 80.18 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (927 points vs 890 points)
Better performance (994 points vs 700 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 476 points)
Better display (900 points vs 877 points)
Against:
Higher price (384.99 USD vs 317 USD)
Worse camera (964 points vs 978 points)
Worse design (392 points vs 562 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.47 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 88.05 percents)