Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Vivo Y73s
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite vs Vivo Y73s
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (317 USD vs 378.28 USD)
Better camera (978 points vs 690 points)
Better battery (890 points vs 505 points)
Better performance (698 points vs 410 points)
Better display (876 points vs 758 points)
Against:
Worse connectivity (473 points vs 601 points)
Worse design (559 points vs 821 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better main camera resolution (64.44 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5260mAh vs 4100mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.47 inch vs 6.44 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (398 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (88.05 percents vs 84.27 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better connectivity (601 points vs 473 points)
Better design (821 points vs 559 points)
Against:
Higher price (378.28 USD vs 317 USD)
Worse camera (690 points vs 978 points)
Worse battery (505 points vs 890 points)
Worse performance (410 points vs 698 points)
Worse display (758 points vs 876 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.44 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4100mAh vs 5260mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 398 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.44 inch vs 6.47 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.27 percents vs 88.05 percents)