Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs Cubot X50

For:

      Lower price (89.99 USD vs 281.19 USD)

      Better battery (528 points vs 517 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (700 points vs 965 points)

      Worse performance (278 points vs 870 points)

      Worse connectivity (285 points vs 742 points)

      Worse display (509 points vs 603 points)

      Worse design (570 points vs 592 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (5 cores vs 3 cores)

Against:

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.57 inch vs 6.67 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 84.02 percents)

For:

      Better camera (965 points vs 700 points)

      Better performance (870 points vs 278 points)

      Better connectivity (742 points vs 285 points)

      Better display (603 points vs 509 points)

      Better design (592 points vs 570 points)

Against:

      Higher price (281.19 USD vs 89.99 USD)

      Worse battery (517 points vs 528 points)

For:

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4520mAh)

For:

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

      More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 5 cores)

For:

      Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.57 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (84.02 percents vs 84.08 percents)