Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 10X 5G vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (89.99 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better battery (531 points vs 519 points)
Against:
Worse camera (703 points vs 966 points)
Worse performance (280 points vs 871 points)
Worse connectivity (290 points vs 745 points)
Worse display (512 points vs 605 points)
Worse design (574 points vs 595 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4520mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2600 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More gpu cores (5 cores vs 3 cores)
Against:
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.57 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.08 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 703 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 280 points)
Better connectivity (745 points vs 290 points)
Better display (605 points vs 512 points)
Better design (595 points vs 574 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 89.99 USD)
Worse battery (519 points vs 531 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 4520mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2600 megahertz)
Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 5 cores)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.57 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.02 percents vs 84.08 percents)