Oppo Reno Ace 2 vs Asus ROG Phone 3

For:

      Better design (789 points vs 392 points)

Against:

      Higher price (599.37 USD vs 384.99 USD)

      Worse camera (900 points vs 964 points)

      Worse battery (377 points vs 927 points)

      Worse performance (928 points vs 994 points)

      Worse connectivity (327 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (822 points vs 900 points)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 6000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)

      Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)

      Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (402 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.55 inch vs 6.59 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (86.14 percents vs 80.18 percents)

For:

      Lower price (384.99 USD vs 599.37 USD)

      Better camera (964 points vs 900 points)

      Better battery (927 points vs 377 points)

      Better performance (994 points vs 928 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 327 points)

      Better display (900 points vs 822 points)

Against:

      Worse design (392 points vs 789 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)

      More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.55 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 402 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 86.14 percents)