Xiaomi Redmi 9 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 9 vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (122 USD vs 158 USD)
Better display (687 points vs 630 points)
Better design (485 points vs 201 points)
Against:
Worse camera (222 points vs 815 points)
Worse battery (743 points vs 773 points)
Worse performance (166 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (515 points vs 849 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5020mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.49 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 222 points)
Better battery (773 points vs 743 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 166 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 515 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 122 USD)
Worse display (630 points vs 687 points)
Worse design (201 points vs 485 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/2.2)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5020mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 83.49 percents)