HTC U20 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 3

For:

      Better design (587 points vs 392 points)

Against:

      Higher price (758.4 USD vs 384.99 USD)

      Worse camera (801 points vs 964 points)

      Worse battery (773 points vs 927 points)

      Worse performance (895 points vs 994 points)

      Worse connectivity (499 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (656 points vs 900 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 6000mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2400 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)

      Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)

      Less rom (262144 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.8 inch vs 6.59 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (387 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (83.76 percents vs 80.18 percents)

For:

      Lower price (384.99 USD vs 758.4 USD)

      Better camera (964 points vs 801 points)

      Better battery (927 points vs 773 points)

      Better performance (994 points vs 895 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 499 points)

      Better display (900 points vs 656 points)

Against:

      Worse design (392 points vs 587 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 2400 megahertz)

      More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 387 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.59 inch vs 6.8 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 83.76 percents)