Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (132.48 USD vs 158 USD)
Better design (476 points vs 201 points)
Against:
Worse camera (83 points vs 815 points)
Worse performance (188 points vs 670 points)
Worse connectivity (222 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (283 points vs 630 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.53 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.77 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (815 points vs 83 points)
Better performance (670 points vs 188 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 222 points)
Better display (630 points vs 283 points)
Against:
Higher price (158 USD vs 132.48 USD)
Worse design (201 points vs 476 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 82.77 percents)