Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (132.48 USD vs 254 USD)
Better design (476 points vs 232 points)
Against:
Worse camera (83 points vs 924 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (188 points vs 663 points)
Worse connectivity (222 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (283 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (1.92 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (680 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.77 percents vs 76.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (924 points vs 83 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 773 points)
Better performance (663 points vs 188 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 222 points)
Better display (775 points vs 283 points)
Against:
Higher price (254 USD vs 132.48 USD)
Worse design (232 points vs 476 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 1.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 680 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.7 percents vs 82.77 percents)