Asus ROG Phone 3 vs Huawei Mate X2

For:

      Lower price (384.99 USD vs 3325.92 USD)

      Better camera (964 points vs 720 points)

      Better battery (927 points vs 644 points)

      Better performance (994 points vs 547 points)

      Better connectivity (971 points vs 788 points)

      Better display (900 points vs 671 points)

      Better design (392 points vs 178 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)

      Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 50.33 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4500mAh)

For:

      More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

      More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (3090 megahertz vs 3130 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.59 inch vs 6.45 inch)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (391 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (80.18 percents vs 80.91 percents)

Against:

      Higher price (3325.92 USD vs 384.99 USD)

      Worse camera (720 points vs 964 points)

      Worse battery (644 points vs 927 points)

      Worse performance (547 points vs 994 points)

      Worse connectivity (788 points vs 971 points)

      Worse display (671 points vs 900 points)

      Worse design (178 points vs 392 points)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)

      Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (50.33 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (3130 megahertz vs 3090 megahertz)

Against:

      Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)

      Less rom (262144 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 391 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.45 inch vs 6.59 inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (80.91 percents vs 80.18 percents)