POCO X3 NFC vs UMiDIGI Bison
Compare Phones: POCO X3 NFC vs UMiDIGI Bison
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (971 points vs 815 points)
Better battery (882 points vs 773 points)
Better performance (725 points vs 670 points)
Better display (775 points vs 630 points)
Better design (600 points vs 201 points)
Against:
Higher price (268.63 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse connectivity (204 points vs 849 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5160mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2200 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Against:
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.3 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.88 percents vs 75.28 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 268.63 USD)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 204 points)
Against:
Worse camera (815 points vs 971 points)
Worse battery (773 points vs 882 points)
Worse performance (670 points vs 725 points)
Worse display (630 points vs 775 points)
Worse design (201 points vs 600 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5160mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2200 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.3 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (75.28 percents vs 84.88 percents)