Oukitel C22 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: Oukitel C22 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (136.99 USD vs 254 USD)
Against:
Worse camera (240 points vs 924 points)
Worse battery (377 points vs 869 points)
Worse performance (298 points vs 663 points)
Worse connectivity (476 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (166 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse aperture (f/2.2 vs f/1.8)
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5.86 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (287 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (924 points vs 240 points)
Better battery (869 points vs 377 points)
Better performance (663 points vs 298 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 476 points)
Better display (775 points vs 166 points)
Against:
Higher price (254 USD vs 136.99 USD)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2.2)
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5150mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 5.86 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 287 pixels per inch)
Design |
|