Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs OnePlus Nord N100

For:

      Better camera (747 points vs 231 points)

      Better connectivity (897 points vs 755 points)

      Better display (933 points vs 330 points)

      Better design (904 points vs 621 points)

Against:

      Higher price (1100.27 USD vs 194.27 USD)

      Worse battery (624 points vs 773 points)

      Worse performance (547 points vs 643 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)

      Better main camera resolution (50.33 Megapixels vs 14.38 Megapixels)

      Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.8)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (4400mAh vs 5000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (3130 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)

      More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)

For:

      Bigger display (6.76 inch vs 6.52 inch)

      Higher pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (94.41 percents vs 83.14 percents)

For:

      Lower price (194.27 USD vs 1100.27 USD)

      Better battery (773 points vs 624 points)

      Better performance (643 points vs 547 points)

Against:

      Worse camera (231 points vs 747 points)

      Worse connectivity (755 points vs 897 points)

      Worse display (330 points vs 933 points)

      Worse design (621 points vs 904 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)

      Worse main camera resolution (14.38 Megapixels vs 50.33 Megapixels)

      Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4400mAh)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 3130 megahertz)

      Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)

Against:

      Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.76 inch)

      Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (83.14 percents vs 94.41 percents)