Huawei Mate 40 RS vs Asus ROG Phone 5
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 40 RS vs Asus ROG Phone 5
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (882 points vs 756 points)
Better display (933 points vs 928 points)
Better design (702 points vs 488 points)
Against:
Higher price (2850.06 USD vs 627.71 USD)
Worse camera (747 points vs 928 points)
Worse battery (624 points vs 927 points)
Worse connectivity (897 points vs 971 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.9 vs f/1.7)
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (50.33 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4400mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (3130 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
More ram (12288 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (262144 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (456 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.76 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (94.41 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (627.71 USD vs 2850.06 USD)
Better camera (928 points vs 747 points)
Better battery (927 points vs 624 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 897 points)
Against:
Worse performance (756 points vs 882 points)
Worse display (928 points vs 933 points)
Worse design (488 points vs 702 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.9)
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 50.33 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4400mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 3130 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 12288 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 262144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.76 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 456 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.98 percents vs 94.41 percents)