Huawei Mate 30E Pro 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Compare Phones: Huawei Mate 30E Pro 5G vs Asus ROG Phone 5 Pro
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (983.99 USD vs 1698.21 USD)
Better camera (942 points vs 928 points)
Better design (900 points vs 483 points)
Against:
Worse battery (643 points vs 928 points)
Worse performance (786 points vs 997 points)
Worse connectivity (753 points vs 971 points)
Worse display (673 points vs 928 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.6 vs f/1.7)
Better video fps (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Better front camera resolution (31.96 Megapixels vs 23.79 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 2.37 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (39.92 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2860 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Less ram (8192 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Less rom (131072 mega bytes vs 524288 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 380 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.78 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (94.36 percents vs 84.98 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (928 points vs 643 points)
Better performance (997 points vs 786 points)
Better connectivity (971 points vs 753 points)
Better display (928 points vs 673 points)
Against:
Higher price (1698.21 USD vs 983.99 USD)
Worse camera (928 points vs 942 points)
Worse design (483 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (2.37 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 39.92 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.6)
Worse video fps (30 fps vs 60 fps)
Worse front camera resolution (23.79 Megapixels vs 31.96 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (16384 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
More rom (524288 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2860 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.78 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (380 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (84.98 percents vs 94.36 percents)