OnePlus Nord N100 vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: OnePlus Nord N100 vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (194.27 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better battery (773 points vs 519 points)
Better connectivity (755 points vs 745 points)
Better design (621 points vs 595 points)
Against:
Worse camera (231 points vs 966 points)
Worse performance (643 points vs 871 points)
Worse display (330 points vs 605 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (14.38 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (5000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Less ram (6144 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.52 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.14 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 231 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 643 points)
Better display (605 points vs 330 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 194.27 USD)
Worse battery (519 points vs 773 points)
Worse connectivity (745 points vs 755 points)
Worse design (595 points vs 621 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 14.38 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.52 inches)
Higher pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.14 percents)