POCO M3 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Compare Phones: POCO M3 vs UMiDIGI Bison GT
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 254 USD)
Better battery (927 points vs 869 points)
Better design (423 points vs 232 points)
Against:
Worse camera (793 points vs 924 points)
Worse performance (475 points vs 663 points)
Worse connectivity (515 points vs 849 points)
Worse display (687 points vs 775 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 36.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5150mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.7 percents vs 76.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (924 points vs 793 points)
Better performance (663 points vs 475 points)
Better connectivity (849 points vs 515 points)
Better display (775 points vs 687 points)
Against:
Higher price (254 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse battery (869 points vs 927 points)
Worse design (232 points vs 423 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (36.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5150mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (76.7 percents vs 83.7 percents)