POCO M3 vs Cubot X50
Compare Phones: POCO M3 vs Cubot X50
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 281.19 USD)
Better battery (927 points vs 519 points)
Better display (687 points vs 605 points)
Against:
Worse camera (793 points vs 966 points)
Worse performance (475 points vs 871 points)
Worse connectivity (515 points vs 745 points)
Worse design (423 points vs 595 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse main camera resolution (48 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 35.95 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4500mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 800 megahertz)
Against:
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.67 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 84.02 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (966 points vs 793 points)
Better performance (871 points vs 475 points)
Better connectivity (745 points vs 515 points)
Better design (595 points vs 423 points)
Against:
Higher price (281.19 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse battery (519 points vs 927 points)
Worse display (605 points vs 687 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 48 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (35.95 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4500mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (800 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.67 inch vs 6.53 inches)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (84.02 percents vs 83.7 percents)