Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compare Phones: Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Summary |
|
For:
Better performance (754 points vs 470 points)
Better connectivity (831 points vs 512 points)
Better display (996 points vs 685 points)
Better design (967 points vs 441 points)
Against:
Higher price (339.99 USD vs 158 USD)
Worse camera (372 points vs 764 points)
Worse battery (748 points vs 900 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (3.24 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (20.11 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.7)
Worse video fps (24 fps vs 30 fps)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (4600mAh vs 6000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2840 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
More ram (8192 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
More rom (131072 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (840 megahertz vs 950 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.81 inch vs 6.53 inch)
Higher pixel density (515 pixels per inch vs 395 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (91.65 percents vs 83.7 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (158 USD vs 339.99 USD)
Better camera (764 points vs 372 points)
Better battery (900 points vs 748 points)
Against:
Worse performance (470 points vs 754 points)
Worse connectivity (512 points vs 831 points)
Worse display (685 points vs 996 points)
Worse design (441 points vs 967 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better aperture (f/1.7 vs f/1.8)
Better video fps (30 fps vs 24 fps)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 3.24 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.11 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (6000mAh vs 4600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (950 megahertz vs 840 megahertz)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2840 megahertz)
Less ram (4096 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Less rom (65536 mega bytes vs 131072 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (6.53 inch vs 6.81 inch)
Lower pixel density (395 pixels per inch vs 515 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (83.7 percents vs 91.65 percents)