Oukitel K15 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Compare Phones: Oukitel K15 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (137.49 USD vs 282.97 USD)
Better battery (984 points vs 712 points)
Better connectivity (512 points vs 470 points)
Against:
Worse camera (136 points vs 742 points)
Worse performance (217 points vs 479 points)
Worse display (263 points vs 887 points)
Worse design (149 points vs 679 points)
Camera |
|
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 64.22 Megapixels)
Worse front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (10000mAh vs 5000mAh)
Performance |
|
Against:
Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)
Lower cpu frequency (1800 megahertz vs 2050 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (500 megahertz vs 900 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 6144 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.52 inch vs 6.43 inch)
Against:
Lower pixel density (269 pixels per inch vs 409 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (77.66 percents vs 83.77 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better camera (742 points vs 136 points)
Better performance (479 points vs 217 points)
Better display (887 points vs 263 points)
Better design (679 points vs 149 points)
Against:
Higher price (282.97 USD vs 137.49 USD)
Worse battery (712 points vs 984 points)
Worse connectivity (470 points vs 512 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (64.22 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)
Better front camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (5000mAh vs 10000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)
Higher cpu frequency (2050 megahertz vs 1800 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (900 megahertz vs 500 megahertz)
More ram (6144 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (409 pixels per inch vs 269 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (6.43 inch vs 6.52 inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (83.77 percents vs 77.66 percents)