Sony Xperia Z5 vs Cubot P20
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia Z5 vs Cubot P20
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (91.99 USD vs 101.49 USD)
Better camera (549 points vs 482 points)
Better performance (359 points vs 333 points)
Better connectivity (499 points vs 67 points)
Against:
Worse battery (121 points vs 308 points)
Worse display (275 points vs 440 points)
Worse design (316 points vs 628 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (22.85 Megapixels vs 15.93 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (5.04 Megapixels vs 7.98 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2900mAh vs 4000mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)
Against:
Lower gpu frequency (600 megahertz vs 650 megahertz)
Less ram (3072 mega bytes vs 4096 mega bytes)
Less rom (32768 mega bytes vs 65536 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 403 pixels per inch)
Against:
Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.18 inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (71.14 percents vs 82.11 percents)
Summary |
|
For:
Better battery (308 points vs 121 points)
Better display (440 points vs 275 points)
Better design (628 points vs 316 points)
Against:
Higher price (101.49 USD vs 91.99 USD)
Worse camera (482 points vs 549 points)
Worse performance (333 points vs 359 points)
Worse connectivity (67 points vs 499 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (7.98 Megapixels vs 5.04 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (15.93 Megapixels vs 22.85 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (4000mAh vs 2900mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher gpu frequency (650 megahertz vs 600 megahertz)
More ram (4096 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
More rom (65536 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (6.18 inch vs 5.2 inches)
Against:
Lower pixel density (403 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (82.11 percents vs 71.14 percents)