Sony Xperia Z3 vs Oukitel C15 Pro+

For:

      Lower price (78 USD vs 99.99 USD)

      Better camera (492 points vs 49 points)

      Better performance (242 points vs 230 points)

      Better connectivity (679 points vs 67 points)

      Better display (275 points vs 99 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (109 points vs 126 points)

      Worse design (357 points vs 395 points)

For:

      Better aperture (f/2 vs f/2.8)

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3100mAh vs 3200mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 2000 megahertz)

Against:

      Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)

      Lower gpu frequency (578 megahertz vs 660 megahertz)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 232 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 6.09 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (71.14 percents vs 80.83 percents)

For:

      Better battery (126 points vs 109 points)

      Better design (395 points vs 357 points)

Against:

      Higher price (99.99 USD vs 78 USD)

      Worse camera (49 points vs 492 points)

      Worse performance (230 points vs 242 points)

      Worse connectivity (67 points vs 679 points)

      Worse display (99 points vs 275 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse aperture (f/2.8 vs f/2)

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (3200mAh vs 3100mAh)

For:

      More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)

      Higher gpu frequency (660 megahertz vs 578 megahertz)

      More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (2000 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (6.09 inch vs 5.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (232 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (80.83 percents vs 71.14 percents)