Sony Xperia Z3 vs Cubot Cheetah 2

For:

      Lower price (78 USD vs 84.67 USD)

      Better camera (492 points vs 406 points)

      Better performance (242 points vs 141 points)

      Better connectivity (679 points vs 59 points)

      Better design (357 points vs 280 points)

Against:

      Worse battery (109 points vs 133 points)

      Worse display (275 points vs 356 points)

For:

      Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)

      Better main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 12.98 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)

For:

      Better battery capacity (3100mAh vs 3000mAh)

For:

      Higher cpu frequency (2500 megahertz vs 1500 megahertz)

      More gpu cores (4 cores vs 3 cores)

      Higher gpu frequency (578 megahertz vs 450 megahertz)

Against:

      Less cpu cores (4 cores vs 8 cores)

      Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)

      Less rom (16384 mega bytes vs 32768 mega bytes)

For:

      Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 401 pixels per inch)

Against:

      Smaller display (5.2 inch vs 5.5 inch)

Against:

      Smaller display area (71.14 percents vs 72.62 percents)

For:

      Better battery (133 points vs 109 points)

      Better display (356 points vs 275 points)

Against:

      Higher price (84.67 USD vs 78 USD)

      Worse camera (406 points vs 492 points)

      Worse performance (141 points vs 242 points)

      Worse connectivity (59 points vs 679 points)

      Worse design (280 points vs 357 points)

For:

      Better front camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)

      Worse main camera resolution (12.98 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)

Against:

      Worse battery capacity (3000mAh vs 3100mAh)

For:

      More cpu cores (8 cores vs 4 cores)

      More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)

      More rom (32768 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)

Against:

      Lower cpu frequency (1500 megahertz vs 2500 megahertz)

      Less gpu cores (3 cores vs 4 cores)

      Lower gpu frequency (450 megahertz vs 578 megahertz)

For:

      Bigger display (5.5 inch vs 5.2 inches)

Against:

      Lower pixel density (401 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)

For:

      Bigger display area (72.62 percents vs 71.14 percents)