Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy J3
Compare Phones: Sony Xperia Z2 vs Samsung Galaxy J3
Summary |
|
For:
Lower price (79 USD vs 117.99 USD)
Better camera (489 points vs 41 points)
Better battery (126 points vs 41 points)
Better performance (226 points vs 85 points)
Better connectivity (431 points vs 67 points)
Better display (275 points vs 93 points)
Better design (256 points vs 249 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better video resolution (0.81 Megapixels vs 0.2 Megapixels)
Better main camera resolution (20.66 Megapixels vs 7.99 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse front camera resolution (2.06 Megapixels vs 4.92 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
For:
Better battery capacity (3200mAh vs 2600mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
Higher cpu frequency (2300 megahertz vs 1200 megahertz)
Higher gpu frequency (578 megahertz vs 400 megahertz)
More ram (3072 mega bytes vs 1024 mega bytes)
More rom (16384 mega bytes vs 8192 mega bytes)
Against:
Less cpu bits (32 bits vs 64 bits)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
For:
Bigger display (5.2 inch vs 5 inch)
Higher pixel density (424 pixels per inch vs 294 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
For:
Bigger display area (69.5 percents vs 68.43 percents)
Summary |
|
Against:
Higher price (117.99 USD vs 79 USD)
Worse camera (41 points vs 489 points)
Worse battery (41 points vs 126 points)
Worse performance (85 points vs 226 points)
Worse connectivity (67 points vs 431 points)
Worse display (93 points vs 275 points)
Worse design (249 points vs 256 points)
Camera |
|
For:
Better front camera resolution (4.92 Megapixels vs 2.06 Megapixels)
Against:
Worse video resolution (0.2 Megapixels vs 0.81 Megapixels)
Worse main camera resolution (7.99 Megapixels vs 20.66 Megapixels)
Battery |
|
Against:
Worse battery capacity (2600mAh vs 3200mAh)
Performance |
|
For:
More cpu bits (64 bits vs 32 bits)
Against:
Lower cpu frequency (1200 megahertz vs 2300 megahertz)
Lower gpu frequency (400 megahertz vs 578 megahertz)
Less ram (1024 mega bytes vs 3072 mega bytes)
Less rom (8192 mega bytes vs 16384 mega bytes)
Connectivity |
|
Display |
|
Against:
Smaller display (5 inch vs 5.2 inch)
Lower pixel density (294 pixels per inch vs 424 pixels per inch)
Design |
|
Against:
Smaller display area (68.43 percents vs 69.5 percents)